- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:43:03 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > > (by "ducks" you don't mean "does not answer", right? Right, I should have said answers. >it > *does* provide an answer in that case, right? > > _:genid <rdf:type> <rdf:Bag>. > _:genid <rdf:_1> "1" . > _:genid <rdf:_2> "2" . > _:genid <rdf:_1> "?" . Yes. > > That's an inconsistency, since _1 is functional > and "?" <> "1". But inconsistency isn't a syntax issue. > Maybe not for here, but something I've been wondering about. As things stand there is no domain constraint on rdf:_nnn. When you say _1 is functional, is that a property of rdf:_1 wherever it is found, or is that a property of rdf:_1 when it is applied to containers? Brian
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 12:44:43 UTC