- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:42:20 +0100
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: aswartz@swartzfam.com, barstow@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian wrote: > jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote: > [...] > > I see all different outputs and I don't see > > a straightforward solution > > (I mean without ontologies and/or logic) > > Solution to what Jos? If you have three different parsers producing > different output, then at least two of them are wrong. We are talking here about DanC's (excellent) testcase http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-abouteach/test1.rdf (issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-abouteach) I was trying to find out the required N-triples result for this testcase which is indeed the required output of an RDF parser (so 'solution' was meant in the sense of the required N-triples result of a testcase). > The solution is for this working group to clearly specify what is right. > Or am I missing something? no problem -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 09:44:34 UTC