W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: cycles in subject/predicate/object? [was: call for agenda items]

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:17:44 +0100 (BST)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31.0106131415560.27373-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Brian McBride wrote:

> Dan Connolly wrote:
> >
> > This business of cycles in the subject/predicate/object graph
> > is an issue
> Dan, please could you clarify what the issue is.  You have a test case.
> The output is quite clear.  What's the problem?

And lest anyone suggest that "s = (s, p, o)" isn't a statement:

"The doors of Durin Lord of Moria:
 speak friend and enter.
 I, Narvi made them:
 Celebrimbor of Hollin drew these signs."

which looks like a self-referential statement that even tips a nod to
the use/mentiion distinction.

jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk
Scrabble gematria: "BIBLE" = "DOGMA"
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 09:19:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:01 UTC