- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:57:12 +0100
- To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
- Cc: aswartz@upclink.com, barstow@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 10:36 AM 6/6/01 +0100, jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com wrote:
> > I believe n3-triples should be changed to n-triples in the minutes.
>
>You are right Aaron, I also saw that. On the other hand I must say
>that n3-triples is good for me (btw if you want to have good Belgium
>beer, you just ask "een triple" so for the sake of unambiguity...)
Has about the same effect on one's head, as well :-)
When I suggested "N-triples", it was because we seemed to be using that
small part of "N3" that could be used to represent (s p o)
triples. N3-triples seems kind-of redundant.
#g
------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 10:25:33 UTC