- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:23:39 -0500
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org> wrote: > So if the above is a typedNode [and I thank Brian for catching > my error], then the triples suggested in: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0138.html > > don't seem to be correct. Why is this? It was my understanding that the example was in the context of Brian's proposal in which the special container syntax was removed and containers were made ordinary typedNodes. Thus, in his proposal this would be perfectly legal, and so it should be defined. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com> ]
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2001 10:23:57 UTC