W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: (tentative) container model proposal

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 20:10:44 +0100
Message-ID: <3B212334.4988D218@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
CC: danbri@w3.org, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote:
> For "incomplete", unordered containers, some type of
> simple "membership" relation might also do... 

I've generally assumed the reason for using rdf:_n properties for bags was
that a graph was considered to be a set of statements, and if one wanted the
same object in a bag more than once a simple membership property wouldn't
do.  Was this part of the original WG's thinking or no?  I'm just curious.

Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 15:12:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:01 UTC