Re: (tentative) container model proposal

Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote:
[...]
> For "incomplete", unordered containers, some type of
> simple "membership" relation might also do... 

I've generally assumed the reason for using rdf:_n properties for bags was
that a graph was considered to be a set of statements, and if one wanted the
same object in a bag more than once a simple membership property wouldn't
do.  Was this part of the original WG's thinking or no?  I'm just curious.

Brian

Received on Friday, 8 June 2001 15:12:23 UTC