- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 20:35:41 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > test2 of Jan's first set of tests states that in a particular case, > the object of the statement is a literal, not a resource. > > test2 of Jan's second set of tests is a different case, falls under the rules > he refered to in his message and I quoted earlier. Those rules require > the object of the statement to a resource. Not to create a resource in this > case would be a change to the spec. > > test2 of Jan's first message says nothing about the interpretation of test2 > from his second set of tests. They are different cases. Yes, you are correct. However, I mentally lumped the issues together, even though they are discussed separately in the spec. I withdraw my comments. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2001 21:37:05 UTC