- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 15:39:27 -0500
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- CC: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Art Barstow wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Jan Grant wrote: > > Bundle of test cases here. > > I just reviewed these test cases and they good! > > The only thing I noticed is that a few of the n-triples > do not have whitespace between the subject and the object. > Is such whitepace a requirement? Yes, I think so. Well... the format wouldn't be ambiguous without it, I don't think, but if you take my perl script as part of the specification we agreed to, it depends on whitespace between terms. http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/n3-simple.pl <- proposal http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0264.html <- meeting record http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jun/0008.html Hmm... I tried to clarify whitespace issues in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0287.html but "any number of spaces" doesn't clearly rule out zero. > [I'd like to know as it > appears I may need to write map a SiRPAC triple dump to > n-triple converter.] Yes, please do support n-triples output from SiRPAC! -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2001 16:39:30 UTC