- From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:19:47 -0400
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:23:12AM +0100, Jan Grant wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Brian McBride wrote: > > > It > > > > Jan Grant wrote: > > > > [...] > > > the xml:base part matches the propAttr production in the grammar of > > > section 6 (production [6.10]) and will (according to section 6 thus far) > > > emit something like: > > > > > > <http://random.ioctl.org/#bletch> <http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespacebase> "http://other.ioctl.org/#zub". > > > > > > ...which looks a bit broken to me. (I'm using the NS-concatenation rule > > > together with the standard binding for the xml namespace here). > > > > Someone, I think it might have been Graham, suggested recently that > > attributes in the xml namespace should not generate properties. > > > > Any thoughts? > > This looks like it might be a good idea; it occurred to me too and I > remember someone mentioning it, but couldn't find the message when I > went looking for it. Why would it be a good idea to not generate triples for these attributes? It seems like the language should have as few execeptions as possible.
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 08:20:52 UTC