- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 11:20:11 +0100
- To: Ora.Lassila@nokia.com
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Unless anyone objects to Ora's conclusions, I'll move this off the active list. Brian Ora.Lassila@nokia.com wrote: > > Additionally I wanted to say that I don't think any of this belongs to the > errata document, this is merely stuff people got confused about when reading > the spec. We will fix this when then next version of the spec is edited. > > - Ora > > -- > Ora Lassila, mailto:ora.lassila@nokia.com, +1 (781) 993-4603 > Research Fellow, Nokia Research Center / Boston > > > ---------- > > From: ext Ora Lassila > > Sent: Friday, June 1, 2001 6:46 > > To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > > Subject: Issue > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-editorial > > > > Some thoughts on how to fix the issues under "rdfms-editorial: General > > editorial comments" > > (http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-editorial): > > > > Issue: parseType="Resource" > > > > It has been suggested that an example would make the spec clearer on the > > usage of parseType="Resource". We can simply add a reference to a later > > example (namely, the one at the end of Section 7.3). I would also reword > > the bit about other values of parseType to read "Other values of > > parseType are reserved for future versions and extensions of RDF" (as > > opposed to "future specifications"; "extensions" takes care of what we > > did in DAML with parseType="daml:collection"). > > > > Issue: the "v namespace" prefix > > > > In the spec's examples we use several "fictional" namespaces, and mostly > > they are undeclared. Given that we now have several well established > > namespaces (e.g., DC & RSS), we can cosnsistently use some of those > > throughout the spec. We should also declare namespaces in every example > > (personally, I think at least in every example which has an "rdf:RDF" > > element, as a convention). > > > > As has been pointed out, "description.org" specifically is not a good > > "sample" URI since this is a real domain belonging to an organization > > promoting more research for Retinitis Pigmentosa. Again, let's use > > "real" URIs. > > > > Regards, > > > > - Ora > > > > -- > > Ora Lassila mailto:daml@lassila.org http://www.lassila.org/ > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 06:21:46 UTC