- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 09:27:31 +0100 (BST)
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote: > Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > > > For the latter two tests, I've included an xml:base attribute in the > > containing rdf:RDF element so that the rdf:ID is calculated corrently > > (can someone check this?) > > I have checked over the tests and they all seem correct. However, I suggest > we do not adopt the xml:base tests as normative, as the issue of xml:base > has not yet be resolved by the WG. To be honest, I have to agree here. I "snuck" it in because I had no idea what URI the test cases would end up at. This needs fixing once we've somewhere to put the test cases. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Unfortunately, I have a very good idea how fast my keys are moving.
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 04:28:41 UTC