- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:04:38 +0100 (BST)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- cc: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Dan Connolly wrote: > Jan Grant wrote: > > > With the inclusion of an interpretation for xml:base attributes: > > > > - relative URIs appearing in rdf:about, rdf:resource, rdf:type > > attributes should probably be resolved relative to the xml:base > > (according to the xml:base spec and normal resolution of relative URIs) > > "should probably"? With the inclusion of xml:base, they MUST, > right? Talking like an Englishman again; sorry. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Prolog in JavaScript: http://tribble.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/~cmjg/logic/prolog-latest
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 12:11:32 UTC