- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:28:57 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > I believe so too, but the compatibility issues look hairy. > > > 2. It isn't clear whether containers (particularly sequences) can > > have 'gaps' or not. > > We decided (1) the spec is indeed unlear here, to > the point of erroneous; (2) they can have gaps; > hmm... at least: I thought we did; > I don't see it in the issues list... and I've reviewed > the meeting records back to May. > > Where the heck did it go? http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#attention-developers On 8th June 2001 the WG decided that an RDF model may contain partial descriptions of a container. Thus an RDF model is not contrained to have the containermembership properties contiguous starting from rdf:_1. Changes to the Model and Syntax specification have been proposed. with a reference to: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jul/0039.html >Chairs? help? Am I hallucinating? I'm sorry, I do not have that information :) Brian
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2001 07:32:30 UTC