- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:32:18 -0700
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>: >Hi > >I've frozen a snapshot of the RDF Schema spec WD that I'm working on: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/20010618/ > >I'll use a new URL for any future versions of the text. OK, this (and Dan C's comments on the model theory) prompts a larger question I have for everyone: how separate/separable are RDF and RDFS? Should we regard them as essentially one integrated language, or as two languages, one an extension of the other? Or is RDFS just one particular RDF vocabulary? More particularly, why are rdf:Property and rdf:type defined in the RDFS documentation? And why do Bag, Seq and Alt have an rdf: prefix but Container has an rdfs: prefix? Why is Literal prefixed with rdfs: but Statement with rdf: ? Pat Hayes --------------------------------------------------------------------- (650)859 6569 w (650)494 3973 h (until September) phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2001 18:31:36 UTC