W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2001

Re: question: URIs with & character

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 15:22:51 -0500
Message-ID: <3B6B081B.6036001E@w3.org>
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
CC: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Aaron Swartz wrote:
> On Friday, August 3, 2001, at 02:20  PM, Ron Daniel wrote:
> > 1) Escape as &amp; and advise RDF applications or processors
> >    that they will need to unescape such things. (Preferably
> >    the RDF processor unescapes it before handing it off to
> >    the calling application, says the guy developing applications
> >    more than RDF parsers.)
> I really, really, hope that most RDF/XML parsers are built on
> top of XML parsers, in which case the &amp; is unescaped for
> free.


> Parsers that do not do proper XML parsing should be taken
> out back and beaten. ;-)

Or perhaps more constructively: we should provide a relevant
test case so that developers can learn about such quirks
before release, and hapless users of such broken parsers
can have a handy test case to go with their bug report etc.

===== amp-in-url.rdf =====
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example/q?abc=1&#38;def=2">

===== amp-in-url.nt =====
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value> "xxx" .

I checked these in under http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/
but I haven't chacled them, and that's probably not the best
place for them.

Art, what is the best place? Would you please copy this test
case there?

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 16:22:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:03 UTC