w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from August 2001 by date

Friday, 31 August 2001

• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) Dan Connolly
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) pat hayes
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) pat hayes
• Re: Telecon 2001-08-31 Draft minutes Frank Manola
• Telecon 2001-08-31 Draft minutes Jan Grant
• Re: Strawman RDFCore Documents structure Graham Klyne
• quick question/request about syntax wdraft Bill de hÓra
• RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 issues and comments Dave Beckett
• RE: Test Cases WD: errata Bill de hÓra
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) Dan Connolly
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) Jan Grant
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) (use/mention in reification) Dan Connolly
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) Brian McBride
• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) Brian McBride

Thursday, 30 August 2001

• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] Dave Beckett
• Re: Reifying using XML attributes only Dave Beckett
• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] pat hayes
• Re: Reifying using XML attributes only Dave Beckett
• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] pat hayes
• Re: Reifying using XML attributes only Art Barstow
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
• Test Cases WD: errata Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Satoshi Nakamura
• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] Art Barstow
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] Frank Manola
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Frank Manola
• Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff) pat hayes
• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] pat hayes
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? pat hayes
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Brian McBride
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 (don't rely on color/stylesheets) Brian McBride
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Frank Manola
• Re: Reifying using XML attributes only Dan Connolly
• Reifying using XML attributes only Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 (don't rely on color/stylesheets) Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 (don't rely on color/stylesheets) Dan Connolly
• Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 Brian McBride
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 Brian McBride
• closed vs. withdrawn (was: Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 Dan Connolly
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2001-08-31 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] Dan Connolly
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Art Barstow
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-transitive-subSubPropery Brian McBride
• Is N-Triples Normative? [Was: Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff)] Art Barstow
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Brian McBride
• Re: re. draft minutes Brian McBride
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Brian McBride
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Brian McBride
• effects of webont WG on RDFCore Brian McBride
• Re: ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers Dan Connolly
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 pat hayes
• re. draft minutes pat hayes
• ACTION 2001-08-24#9 : issues with containers pat hayes
• Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff) pat hayes

Wednesday, 29 August 2001

• subclass loops and proper subclasses (was: Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24) pat hayes
• Re: model theory (Alt and disjunction: just say no) pat hayes
• Re: model theory pat hayes
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] pat hayes
• Re: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf pat hayes
• Fwd: thoughts on the new rdfs:subClassOf pat hayes
• Fwd: summary: acyclic class hierarchy pat hayes
• Re: Missing test cases? Art Barstow
• Re: Missing test cases? Aaron Swartz
• Missing test cases? Art Barstow
• Re: Resignation Brian McBride
• Re: Resignation Dan Brickley
• Re: Resignation Art Barstow
• Re: namedNode? in predicate position? Dave Beckett
• namedNode? in predicate position? jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: subclass loops was: Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Jan Grant
• subclass loops was: Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Frank Manola
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Brian McBride
• http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-transitive-subSubPropery Jan Grant
• Re: model theory Dan Connolly
• Re: model theory (W3C publication stuff) Dan Connolly
• Re: model theory (Alt and disjunction: just say no) Dan Connolly
• Re: model theory Dan Connolly
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Tuesday, 28 August 2001

• Re: model theory Aaron Swartz
• model theory pat hayes
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 pat hayes
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RE: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) Bill de hÓra
• <rdf:RDF> optional? (was Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 ) Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Aaron Swartz
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Dave Beckett
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 Dave Beckett
• photos wanted Brian McBride
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Dave Beckett
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Brian McBride

Monday, 27 August 2001

• Re: completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) pat hayes
• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) pat hayes
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] pat hayes
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] pat hayes
• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) pat hayes
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] pat hayes
• Re: New RDF model theory pat hayes
• Re: layering RDFS in the MT [was: New RDF model theory] pat hayes
• Re: Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Martyn Horner

Saturday, 25 August 2001

• completion of action: 2001-07-27#2 (long) dehora

Friday, 24 August 2001

• Re: Resignation Brian McBride
• belated regrets Ron Daniel
• Draft Minutes 2001-08-24 Aaron Swartz
• Re: Draft Minutes of the 2001-08-17 Telecon Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Jeremy Carroll
• Resignation Art Barstow
• regrets dehora
• AGENDA RDFCore telecon 2001-08-24 Brian McBride
• completion of action ACTION 2001-08-02#22 put Kwon's presentation in archive Brian McBride
• Re: Draft Minutes of the 2001-08-17 Telecon Brian McBride
• Draft Minutes of the 2001-08-17 Telecon Brian McBride

Thursday, 23 August 2001

• Re: rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Paul Grosso
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Dan Connolly
• Re: rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Paul Grosso
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Dan Connolly
• RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft - Internal Draft V1.16 Dave Beckett
• Re: rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Paul Grosso
• Re: F2F action point 2001-08-02#10 and issue rdfs-constraining-containers Jan Grant
• agenda will be late and call for items Brian McBride
• Re: F2F action point 2001-08-02#10 and issue rdfs-constraining-containers Brian McBride

Wednesday, 22 August 2001

• Re: RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only Jeremy Carroll
• Re: containers test0004 baffles me Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: containers test0004 baffles me Jeremy Carroll
• Re: First cut at Test Case Working Draft Jeremy Carroll
• Anti-regrets Jeremy Carroll
• Re: First cut at Test Case Working Draft Aaron Swartz
• First cut at Test Case Working Draft Art Barstow
• Re: containers test0004 baffles me Dan Connolly
• containers test0004 baffles me Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 21 August 2001

• Re: RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only Jan Grant
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only Aaron Swartz
• Infoset representations in HTML and RDF (fwd) Dave Beckett
• Re: F2F action point 2001-08-02#10 and issue rdfs-constraining-containers Jan Grant
• Re: F2F action point 2001-08-02#10 and issue rdfs-constraining-containers Jan Grant
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only by way of
• Re: F2F action point 2001-08-02#10 and issue rdfs-constraining-containers Brian McBride
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only Dan Connolly
• RDF/XML Syntax - reifying using XML attributes only Dave Beckett
• F2F action point 2001-08-02#10 and issue rdfs-constraining-containers Jan Grant
• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Monday, 20 August 2001

• Whiteboard Picture Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 18 August 2001

• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) Frank Manola
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: test case file names jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 17 August 2001

• Re: test case file names Art Barstow
• test case file names Art Barstow
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) Dave Beckett
• Existential Quantification [Re: New RDF model theory] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: New RDF model theory Jeremy Carroll
• Re: layering RDFS in the MT [was: New RDF model theory] Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 16 August 2001

• Re: Where's the S? (was: Re: RDFS WD snapshot frozen: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/20010618/) pat hayes
• Re: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17 Sergey Melnik
• Re: Where's the S? (was: Re: RDFS WD snapshot frozen: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/20010618/) Dan Brickley
• Re: layering RDFS in the MT [was: New RDF model theory] Sergey Melnik
• Where's the S? (was: Re: RDFS WD snapshot frozen: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/20010618/) pat hayes
• Re: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17 pat hayes
• RDFS WD snapshot frozen: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/Schema/20010618/ Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17 Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17 Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17 pat hayes
• Re: New RDF model theory pat hayes
• Re: layering RDFS in the MT [was: New RDF model theory] pat hayes
• Re: Introduction: Jeremy Carroll pat hayes
• Re: #rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Jeremy Carroll
• Introduction: Jeremy Carroll Jeremy Carroll
• Re: toward 3 WDs this month (MT, RDF/XML, test suite) [was: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17] Art Barstow
• toward 3 WDs this month (MT, RDF/XML, test suite) [was: RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17] Dan Connolly
• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• RDFCore telecon agenda for 2001-08-17 Brian McBride
• Re: Working on glossary Martyn Horner
• Re: Working on glossary Dan Connolly
• Re: New RDF model theory Frank Manola
• rdf:parseType="Literal" and XML Fragment interchange Dan Connolly
• Re: completion of ACTION 2001-08-02#5 Brian McBride
• 2001-07-27 minutes Dan Brickley
• Working on glossary Martyn Horner
• Re: completion of ACTION 2001-08-02#5 Dan Connolly
• completion of ACTION 2001-08-02#5 Brian McBride
• apologies for 8/17 teleconference Frank Manola
• Re: On F2F Decisions Aaron Swartz
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Eric Miller
• updated f2f minutes Brian McBride
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Brian McBride
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Brian McBride
• Re: On F2F Decisions Brian McBride
• layering RDFS in the MT [was: New RDF model theory] Dan Connolly
• Re: New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) Dan Connolly
• missing image pat hayes

Wednesday, 15 August 2001

• New RDF model theory (well, damn nearly) pat hayes
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Aaron Swartz
• RDF Schema and WebOnt Coordination Aaron Swartz
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes pat hayes
• doc1.rdf instance of doc2.rdf? SWAD requirement Dan Connolly
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Dan Connolly
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Brian McBride
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Dan Connolly
• Call for agenda items Brian McBride

Tuesday, 14 August 2001

• Re: Strawman RDFCore Documents structure Dan Connolly
• Re: Strawman RDFCore Documents structure Frank Manola
• Re: #rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Dan Connolly
• #rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure Brian McBride
• Strawman RDFCore Documents structure Brian McBride
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Mike Dean

Monday, 13 August 2001

• Re: RDF issues from F2F presentation Martyn Horner
• Re: RDF issues from F2F presentation Graham Klyne
• Re: F2F Feedback Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Issues from MusicBrainz Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Issues from MusicBrainz Graham Klyne

Saturday, 11 August 2001

• Issue rdfs-transitive-subSubProperty and AP 2001-08-02#18 Jan Grant

Friday, 10 August 2001

• Resolution of: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources ? Graham Klyne
• Regrets Graham Klyne
• Re: F2F Meeting Minutes Graham Klyne
• On F2F Decisions Aaron Swartz
• F2F Meeting Minutes Brian McBride

Thursday, 9 August 2001

• Tommorrow's 2001-08-10 meeting *cancelled* (but keep up the good work!) Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 8 August 2001

• Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon [Was: W3C-MIT server outage: mailing lists are down] jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• W3C-MIT server outage: mailing lists are down Dan Brickley
• RDF issues from F2F presentation Martyn Horner

Tuesday, 7 August 2001

• Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: updated draft of model theory pat hayes
• Re: updated draft of model theory pat hayes
• Re: What is assumed? pat hayes
• Re: updated draft of model theory pat hayes

Monday, 6 August 2001

• F2F Feedback Brian McBride
• Re: Actions from F2F available Art Barstow
• Re: question: URIs with & character Art Barstow
• Re: [Fwd: rdfms-literals-as-resources] Dan Connolly

Sunday, 5 August 2001

• Re: Actions from F2F available Dan Brickley
• Actions from F2F available Brian McBride
• Re: RDF Issues from MusicBrainz Brian McBride
• RDF Issues from MusicBrainz Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 4 August 2001

• F2F IRC transcripts Brian McBride

Friday, 3 August 2001

• [Fwd: rdfms-literals-as-resources] Brian McBride
• Flip Chart Transcrips Brian McBride
• Re: question: URIs with & character Dan Connolly
• Re: question: URIs with & character Aaron Swartz
• question: URIs with & character Ron Daniel
• Re: summary of principles Dan Connolly

Thursday, 2 August 2001

• summary of principles Ron Daniel

Wednesday, 1 August 2001

• 2001-07-27 rdfcore raw irc log Dan Brickley

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2001 14:36:47 UTC