Response to issues?

Did anyone have anything to say with regard to the issues i
raised in my messages concerning the current "HTML-Math" proposal?

As a quick reminder, these included:

  - extensibility from the start (e.g. rendering to text)
  - staying general beyond math
  - inability to express functions of functions or composition
  - distinct meanings for indices and name-qualifiers
  - treatment of text as part of the semantic tree

It's been a good week and a half since i posted them -- did
these messages get received all right?

Please let me know if there were problems.


Thanks,

Ka-Ping Yee