Here are some items on the plate which I think might be valuable discussing on the Monday call: 1. Goals for the Sep30/Oct1 meeting and suggestions for agenda The scheme I posted previously as a preliminary preliminary agenda suggested that we solidify our ideas of the Wolfram Proposal and then play off it to incorporate other ideas. I myself am concerned with (a) filtering TeX data into the standard and (b) understanding the WP's rendering abilities to non-visual targets (with macros and template-matching). I can list many sub-concerns and think that running through examples may help a great deal, but I'd like people to suggest their own points for discussion. I hope that the process of phrasing topics may allow for preliminary electronic discussion as well. Agenda: Wolfram Proposal base language operator-precedence table extension by macros template-matching rendering to visual display, audio, CAS, etc. semantical cues clipping interface with browsers, CSS, fonts filtering data from TeX, ISO 12083 MINSE Dave Raggett's alternatives There will be advantage to dealing with specific issues of MINSE and Dave's ideas as their relevant points of comparison in the WP arise. 2. Semantics. We can continue our electronic discussion regarding the degree to which semantics will impinge on the HTML-Math standard. 3. We can also get updates from various parties involved in development. -RonReceived on Friday, 23 August 1996 16:43:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 15 April 2023 17:19:57 UTC