- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:11:42 -0500
- To: jose.kahan@w3.org
- CC: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Just to speak for a different part of IBM... I strongly agree with you and disagree with John. I think it would be a big mistake to change the current definition of C14N. There are too many ways for new and old software and to-be-signed data files to interact that could end up with misleading errors, false negatives, or excessive work. And as mother always said, "two wrongs don't make a right." /r$ -- SOA Appliance Group IBM Application Integration Middleware * This address is going away; please use rsalz@us.ibm.com *
Received on Friday, 16 December 2005 16:11:38 UTC