- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:09:01 +0100 (MET)
- To: reagle@mit.edu
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Thanx Joseph, It probably does. A question though arises when we are talking standards: Does this work have major support? The paper is very hard to read, not a single example. Although only experts should deal with XML canonicalization, experience shows that quite a lot of people roll their own stuff due to a need to integrate with other pieces that may not fit publicly available libraries. Anders ----Original Message---- From: reagle@mit.edu Date: Nov 16, 2005 4:43:45 PM To: Josseline <anders.rundgren@telia.com> Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subj: Re: Schema centric canonicalization - Need and status On Wednesday 16 November 2005 10:17, you wrote: > Essentially I have two options. Cripple schemas or invent a new > algorithm. Does this not work? http://www.uddi.org/pubs/SchemaCentricCanonicalization-20020710.htm
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 16:09:23 UTC