- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:38:25 -0500
- To: Berin Lautenbach <berin@wingsofhermes.org>
- CC: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
I suggest the following approach... Someone (or more) write a W3C Note that defines the "obvious" URI's (i.e., in the DSIG namespace) for sha-256, sha-512, and ripemd-160. In the note say something like while not a formal recommendation or standards track RFC, implementations complying with this note MUST implement sha256 and sha512 and MAY implement RIPEMD160." Then work to get the W3C Note used as the basis for an XML DSIG errata and an IETF RFC. /r$ -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 15:38:39 UTC