- From: Andy Philips <Andy.Philips@oracle.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:51:27 -0800
- To: "John Messing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>, "Manoj K. Srivastava" <manoj@infomosaic.com>
- Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Or multiple digest formats for one message as it seems unlikely (although not impossible until proven otherwise ;) that two digests could be broken in the same attack. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Messing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> To: "Manoj K. Srivastava" <manoj@infomosaic.com> Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 2:42 PM Subject: RE: Broken SHA-1 > > Or alternatives to digest algorithms entirely, since they all may be > subject to the same attacks, over time. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Broken SHA-1 > > From: "Manoj K. Srivastava" <manoj@infomosaic.com> > > Date: Wed, February 16, 2005 12:09 pm > > To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > > > > Does the standards body have any plans to allow any alternate digest > > algorithm? > > > > > > > > http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Manoj K. Srivastava > > Infomosaic Corporation > > 2118 Walsh Avenue, Suite 200 > > Santa Clara, CA 95050 > > Voice: (408) 988-4337 > > Fax: (408) 516-9427 > > <http://www.infomosaic.net/> > > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is > > for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential > > and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, Please > > contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original > > message. > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:28:04 UTC