- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:33:44 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>, John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>
- Cc: "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, "w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org" <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, "w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Peter F. \\ Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
At 20:57 03/07/24 -0400, Rich Salz wrote: >I would like it to be made VERY EXPLICIT that this is non-normative >advice for those intending to use xml-c14n for something other than its >originally intended purpose. If the text was more than a paragraph -- or >if it's possible to add more, so it becomes more than a paragraph -- I'd >even rather see it as a separate W3C note. > >And, by the way, shouldn't we all be using exc-c14n instead of c14n >whenever possible? The request actually came from exc-c14n. But that one relies on c14n for that particular aspect of its definition. Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 25 July 2003 16:22:43 UTC