- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:43:08 -0500
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
On Friday, Jan 10, 2003, at 13:37 US/Eastern, Rich Salz wrote: >> I feel like I understand Marc, but I'm not following you Rich. > > Sorry, I'll try again. I agree that &dsig:SignedInfo is unlikely to > ever need soap-c14n. +1. > But Marc mentioned defining a new URI that is a combination of two > other c14n methods since SignedInfo doesn't take a Transforms element. > I was just pointing out that if this becomes common practice, we're > gonna be in trouble, interop-wise. > Another +1, sorry for suggesting it, lets hope nobody noticed ;-). Sounds like casting the soap-c14n spec as a transform is the best bet, I'll modify it accordingly. Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 13:42:46 UTC