- From: Pae Choi <paechoi@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:21:31 -0500
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, "David Wall" <dwall@Yozons.com>
- Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
> > > My gut tells me that XML Signature is really best suited for those automated > > transactions in which there is a well defined "contract" defined by the XML > > (via XML Schema, no doubt) with well known parties sending the transactions. > > For example, an order entry system that generates fixed transations within a > > group of customers/suppliers/manufacturers. > > Web services: loosely coupled, tightly contracted. > Agree from the architectural standpoint, but not so "tightly contracted" from the operational point of view until we have an unified standard for the "Inter-business Process Collaboration", a.k.a., "choreography", "orchestration" or "conversation." Pae
Received on Saturday, 14 December 2002 20:21:31 UTC