- From: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:34:08 -0700
- To: reagle@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hi, Joseph! I found that using XPointers instead of XPath in case of XMLSec/LibXML gives about 10% validation time decrease for the sign-xfdl.xml file from the XPath 2 filter interop tests suite. So I thought that it'll be interesting to include this functionality into the spec. However, you gave a very good reason why this is a bad idea right now. May be it would be interesting to do it when new XPointer spec is ready. With best regards, Aleksey >I'm comfortable with a REQUIRED reliance upon a normative >reference to the XPath Recommendation; I'm less comfortable with a reliance >on the old (abandoned) XPointer Candidate REC, or the new Working Drafts. >(In fact, this is inappropriate going back to the maturity issue.) >
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2002 12:34:06 UTC