Re: minimal canonicalization

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

At 11:12 AM 7/25/2002 -0400, Ed Simon wrote:
>I don't think UPnP would be UPnP if endpoints had to dictate how
>servers create the data they send; it is not how the data is created
>that is the concern but what the data is coming out of the server.
>
>Just because an endpoint uses SAX doesn't mean a server can't use
>DOM.  

That is correct.  We have to be agnostic to choice of parser
technology.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.1

iQA/AwUBPUFjM8xqBGb+WvJAEQJvqACfeH/RIldm4sgeMurYrhl7zExc4G4AoK4t
TUVKe3eAF0IQwhziZ0HL+0e6
=CLnb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


+--------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl Ellison      Intel Labs        E: cme@jf.intel.com |
|2111 NE 25th Ave                    T: +1-503-264-2900  |
|Hillsboro OR 97124                  F: +1-503-264-6225  |
|PGP Key ID: 0xFE5AF240              C: +1-503-819-6618  |
|  1FDB 2770 08D7 8540 E157  AAB4 CC6A 0466 FE5A F240    |
+--------------------------------------------------------+

Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 10:57:52 UTC