Friday, 28 September 2001
- Removal of XML/Schema Validation Transforms
 - Tweak to Schema
 - WWW2002 CFP
 - XML Digital Signature Demo and Library
 - Re: X509 Schema Tweaks (Was: XML Signature schema implementation)
 
Thursday, 27 September 2001
- RE: X509 Schema Tweaks (Was: XML Signature schema implementation)
 - Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - X509 Schema Tweaks (Was: XML Signature schema implementation)
 - Re: Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object
 - Re: Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object
 - Should we define a "critical" flag for ds:Object
 - Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 
Wednesday, 26 September 2001
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
Monday, 24 September 2001
Friday, 21 September 2001
- Re: XML Signature schema implementation
 - RE: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - RE: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - RE: Purpose of CRL
 - RE: Purpose of CRL
 - RE: Purpose of CRL
 - Purpose of CRL
 - Re: XML Signature schema implementation
 - Re: Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 
Thursday, 20 September 2001
Wednesday, 19 September 2001
- Poll (Was: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform))
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 
Tuesday, 18 September 2001
- Re: Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
 - RE: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Fw: Re:Call for Review: XML Digital Signature is a W3C Proposed Recommendation
 
Friday, 14 September 2001
- Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Re: X509SubjectName and binary values
 
Thursday, 13 September 2001
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
- Re: latest draft xmldsig
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
Monday, 10 September 2001
- Re: xml/digsig mime type?
 - xml/digsig mime type?
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 
Sunday, 10 September 800
Thursday, 6 September 2001
- Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Comment from PR Review: Is XML1.0 parsing well-formed or validating?
 
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
- Encoding whitespace in DNAME (Was: W3C Proposed Recommendation:)
 - Re: Responses to two Character Model last call issues
 - Re: Schema Contributions to C14N (Was: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section)
 - Re: Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - RE: FW: Base64
 
Tuesday, 4 September 2001
- Question for Implementors (Was: Schema Validation Transform)
 - Re: FW: Base64
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: FW: Base64
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 
Monday, 3 September 2001
- Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Signature overview - minor additional modifications
 - Comments for PR-xmldsig-core-20010820
 
Saturday, 1 September 2001
Friday, 31 August 2001
Thursday, 30 August 2001
- Join the fight to quality. Make 36 Annually secured
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
- RE: FW: Base64
 - Re: FW: Base64
 - Re: FW: Base64
 - RE: FW: Base64
 - Responses to two Character Model last call issues
 - RE: FW: Base64
 - Re: Error in DSAKeyValue DTD/Schema
 
Tuesday, 28 August 2001
- Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: FW: Base64
 - Re: Schema Validation Transform
 - Error in DSAKeyValue DTD/Schema
 - RE: FW: Base64
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - RE: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation:
 - RE: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - Schema Validation Transform
 
Monday, 27 August 2001
- Re: Same-document reference
 - Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - RE: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - RE: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - Re: Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - Why is the Target attribute in SignatureProperty required?
 - Same-document reference
 - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-2-01.txt
 
Friday, 24 August 2001
- Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 
Thursday, 23 August 2001
- Re: signature overview question/comment
 - How to multi-sign?
 - Re: How to multi-sign?
 - How to multi-sign?
 
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
- Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: signature overview question/comment
 
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
- Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Re: Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 - Enveloped-signature games with pre-c14n
 
Monday, 20 August 2001
Friday, 17 August 2001
Thursday, 16 August 2001
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
- Re: Base64
 - Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: Problem with indentation
 - Re: Tweaked Section 6.4.1
 - RE: signature overview question/comment
 
Tuesday, 14 August 2001
Friday, 10 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Tuesday, 7 August 2001
Monday, 6 August 2001
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: a typo in section 6.4.1 ?
 - RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - RE: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: XPath Expression
 - Re: XPath Expression
 - a typo in section 6.4.1 ?
 - XPath Expression
 
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
- RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input
 - RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input
 - RE: Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input
 - Re: Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf
 - Question: Transform Nodeset Input
 - Question: Base64 Transform Nodeset Input
 
Monday, 30 July 2001
- Join the Middle Class Rich!
 - Exclusive C14N (Was: Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf)
 - Minutes of 2001-07-30 Teleconf
 - RE: Questions about c14n implementation
 - RE: Questions about c14n implementation
 - Re: Questions about c14n implementation
 - Re: Questions about c14n implementation
 - Questions about c14n implementation
 
Saturday, 28 July 2001
Friday, 27 July 2001
- RE: C14N Argument
 - Comment on Exclusive Canonicalization
 - RE: Section 4.3.3.2
 - Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 - RE: Section 4.3.3.2
 - RE: C14N Argument
 - RE: C14N Argument
 - Re: Section 4.3.3.2
 - RE: C14N Argument
 - Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 - RE: C14N Argument
 - clarifications on XML Schema base64Binary type
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief?
 
Thursday, 26 July 2001
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
- RE: C14N Argument
 - RE: C14N Argument
 - RE: C14N Argument
 - XSLT and Schema Processing Model within XMLDSIG
 - C14N Argument
 - Surreptitious Forwarding
 - xmldsig Call 13:00 EST July 30
 - Python Canonical XML
 - Re: What's a relative Namespace URI?
 - Re: What's a relative Namespace URI?
 - What's a relative Namespace URI?
 
Tuesday, 24 July 2001
- Canonical XML implementation
 - Publication of Draft ETSI TS "XML Advanced Electronic Signatures" for public comment: CORRECT LINK: STF178Task3Draft.pdf
 - Publication of Draft ETSI TS on XML Advanced Electronic Signatures for public comment
 
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
Monday, 16 July 2001
- Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec
 - Re: Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec
 
Sunday, 15 July 2001
- Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Editorial problem in Section 4.2 of digital signature spec
 
Friday, 13 July 2001
Thursday, 12 July 2001
- Re: Schema Contributions to C14N (Was: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section)
 - Schema Contributions to C14N (Was: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section)
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - RE: ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief?
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - RE: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - ARe: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - ID/DTD/c14n/dsig mischief?
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 - xfdl and xfa
 - Re: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 - RE: Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 
Wednesday, 11 July 2001
- Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Re: initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - Suggested additions to 3.0 Processing Rules section
 
Monday, 9 July 2001
- Section 4.3.3.2
 - initial Exclusive Canonicalization draft
 - RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - Re: SPKIData.ANY
 - Re: CDATA vs. EMPTY
 - Re: CDATA vs. EMPTY
 
Sunday, 8 July 2001
Saturday, 7 July 2001
- Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 
Friday, 6 July 2001
- Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 
Thursday, 5 July 2001
- RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - RE: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - Re: Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - Canonicalization of <SignedInfo> for Reference Validation
 - RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - Describing Objects (Was: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference)
 - Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - RE: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - Re: DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference
 - DateTime (DT) attribute in Reference