W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Empty SignedInfo elements properly canonicalized in examples?

From: Jesse Pelton <jsp@PKC.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:46:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CC6353ECB19ED4118E9500A0C99D6DCC08E45C@PKC_VT01>
To: "'Donald E. Eastlake 3rd'" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: "'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Of course. Thanks for clarifying.

-----Original Message-----
From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd [mailto:dee3@torque.pothole.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:39 PM
To: Jesse Pelton
Cc: 'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'
Subject: Re: Empty SignedInfo elements properly canonicalized in
examples? 



There is no need for the SignedInfo to be in canonical form if the
SignatureValue was calculated using the canonical form and is verified
using the canonical form. That this was done for generation and is to
be done for verification is whatthe content of CanonicalizationMethod
means.

Donald
Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 15:48:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:10:05 UTC