- From: Jesse Pelton <jsp@PKC.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:09:54 -0400
- To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: "'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
That makes sense for all examples except the two I cited. Since those are examples of specifying a CanonicalizationMethod, shouldn't they be represented using that method? It seems confusing to give examples that are invalid. If I understand the spec correctly, you couldn't actually validate the example in 2.1, which is represented as a (presumably correct) detached signature of the content of the XHTML 1.0 recommendation. -----Original Message----- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. [mailto:reagle@w3.org] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 3:00 PM To: Jesse Pelton Cc: 'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org' Subject: Re: Empty SignedInfo elements properly canonicalized in examples? Examples in the dsig spec are not canonicalized. I added a sentence to [s03], "Note that this example, and all examples in this specification, are not in canonical form."
Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 15:11:37 UTC