- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:13:00 +0100
- To: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>
- Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Hi Gregor, r/gregor.karlinger@iaik.at/2001.05.24/14:08:19 > I have not thought a lot about the consequences of the following idea, > but anyway: Should we add an additional rule both to the processing > rules for signature generation and validation, that the SignedInfo > element should be isolated from its context prior to computing > the canonicalized representation? Unfortunately we can't isolate SignedInfo. An XPath/XSLT Transform can legitimately rely on inherited namespaces. I have a queued followup to my earlier question on this topic, I just need to finish it. Merlin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or appearance at trade shows and conferences. This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including computer viruses. http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2001 08:13:35 UTC