- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:42:04 -0400
- To: "johnmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>
- Cc: "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, "Dournaee, Blake" <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 07:13 5/18/2001 -0700, johnmessing wrote:
>I would make mime-type optional.
They are both optional [1]. The question is can we find a compelling
reasoning for maintaining both of them, and if so, how do they interact?
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-xmldsig-core-20010419/#sec-Object
<element name="Object" type="ds:ObjectType"/>
<complexType name="ObjectType" mixed="true">
<sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
</sequence>
<attribute name="Id" type="ID" use="optional"/>
<attribute name="MimeType" type="string" use="optional"/>
<attribute name="Encoding" type="anyURI" use="optional"/>
</complexType>
__
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 10:42:24 UTC