- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:24:46 -0400
- To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: "Dournaee, Blake" <bdournaee@rsasecurity.com>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
At 08:34 5/17/2001 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >Close, but I would think it would be more like > ><Object Id="arbitraryBase64EncodedData" > Encoding="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#base64" > MimeType="application/octet-stream"> The reason this concerned me is I think the spec is a bit ambigous on this note. In your instance the Encoding and MimeType are redundant -- I think? Or is the MimeType the type of the object regardless of its encoding? __ Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 09:24:57 UTC