RE: Canonical XML 3.6

Hi Rick,

I considered this feedback, as shown in the latest c14n issues document, but
came to the conclusion that I did not see anything confusing about

"The content of the doc element is NOT the string #xC2#xA9 but rather the
two octets whose hexadecimal values are C2 and A9, which is the UTF-8
encoding of the UCS codepoint for the copyright symbol (C)."

which appears as the only note in the example.  It seems impossible to miss.

John Boyer
Team Leader, Software Development
Distributed Processing and XML
PureEdge Solutions Inc.
Creating Binding E-Commerce
v: 250-479-8334, ext. 143  f: 250-479-3772
1-888-517-2675   http://www.PureEdge.com <http://www.pureedge.com/>



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Rick Jelliffe
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 1:45 AM
To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Subject: Canonical XML 3.6



S. 3.6 of Canonical XML is still confusing, in that the notation is not
explained.

It would be better to give a hex dump of the whole document

 < d  o c  >      <  / d  o c >
 3c64 6f63 3eC2 a93c 2f64 6f63 3e

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 12:57:17 UTC