Re: ECDSA in XML

Hi, Tom,
thanks for your comments... I will rewrite the example and contruct some
authentic values... (the values in the previous example is just some
garbage characters)... I will do this after come back from IETF meeting
in San Diego next week..
best regards,
Yongge







"Tom Gindin" <tgindin@us.ibm.com> on 12/08/2000 07:02:15 PM

To:   Yongge Wang/Certicom@Certicom
cc:   Simon Blake-Wilson/Certicom@Certicom, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

Subject:  Re: ECDSA in XML





     Thank you.  I would remove the "X509Certificate" from the example, as
it isn't necessary with both SubjectName and IssuerSerial present, and the
value given seems far too short.

          Tom Gindin

"Yongge Wang" <ywang@certicom.com> on 12/08/2000 03:16:08 PM

To:   Tom Gindin/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:   "Simon Blake-Wilson" <sblakewilson@certicom.com>,
      w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subject:  Re: ECDSA in XML



Hi, Tom,
Does this example make sense?
I have tried to open it with the IBM XML Viewer, it seems ok...
Note that I used the option: <!DOCTYPE Signature SYSTEM
"xmldsig-core-schema.dtd" .....
and the file xmldsig-core-schema.dtd was downloaded from
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-core-schema.dtd
and this file contains an error: line 109 should be: <!ELEMENT
SignatureProperty
 %SignatureProperty.ANY; >
(The last ; is missed in the downloaded file).

Best regards,
Yongge



(See attached file: xml-ecdsa-example.xml)


To: "Simon Blake-Wilson" <sblakewilson@certicom.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-ID:
<OFCB0BEEAD.E08117C4-ON8525699A.005CBEFA@somers.hqregion.ibm.com>
From: "Tom Gindin" <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:06:40 -0500
Subject: Re: ECDSA in XML


     This draft doesn't contain any examples yet, so it's fairly hard to
critique, or test against.  It did take a while to do the examples for
PKCS-1.
     This may be an ignorant comment by someone who is far from being an
XML guru, but I didn't see a revised version of the Schema definition of
KeyValue incorporating ECDSAKeyValue, which would naturally go in there.

          Tom Gindin

Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 19:46:52 UTC