- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 14:37:42 -0500
- To: "Karl Scheibelhofer" <Karl.Scheibelhofer@iaik.at>
- Cc: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>, "XMLSigWG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 12:37 11/8/2000 +0100, Karl Scheibelhofer wrote:
>i attached a "xmldsig-core-schema" with named types in the style you showed
>in [1].
Hi Karl,
The only stylistic difference in what I did was something I followed from
the schema specifications themselves where the type is NOT the same name as
the instance (for clarity), but append "Type" to the element name. It's a
trivial matter really, but my inclination would to be follow the spec style.
<xsd:element name="purchaseOrder" type="PurchaseOrderType"/>
<xsd:complexType name="PurchaseOrderType">
...
__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2000 14:37:53 UTC