Re: Very minor comment in the spec.

     Speaking of MINOR corrections, it's ISO/IEC 9594-8:1997 in the
reference.  The colon is needed.  No comments as to the anatomical location
of this correction are needed, however :-)

          Tom Gindin

"Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> on 10/05/2000 04:35:52 PM

To:   Tom Gindin/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
cc:   "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Very minor comment in the spec.



Ok, so I've tweaked that section as follows:

4.4.4 The X509Data Element
...
An X509Data element within KeyInfo contains one or more identifiers of keys
or X509 certificates (or certificates' identifiers or revocation lists).
Five types of X509Data are defined
1. The X509IssuerSerial element, which contains an X.509 issuer
distinguished name/serial number pair that SHOULD be compliant with RFC2253
[LDAP-DN],
2. The X509SubjectName element, which contains an X.509 subject
distinguished name that SHOULD be compliant with RFC2253 [LDAP-DN],
3. The X509SKI element, which contains an X.509 subject key identifier
value.
4. The X509Certificate element, which contains a Base64-encoded [X509v3]
certificate, and
5. The X509CRL element, which contains a Base64-encoded certificate
revocation list (CRL) [X509v3].
...

REFERENCES
...
[X509v3]
ITU-T Recommendation X.509 version 3 (1997). "Information Technology - Open
Systems Interconnection - The Directory Authentication Framework"  ISO/IEC
9594-81997.

__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 19:42:45 UTC