- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 16:22:46 -0400
- To: "'E.schalueck@ce-ag.com'" <E.schalueck@ce-ag.com>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
[I'm cc:ing the list so we have a record of the changes, most of these are small, but I wouldn't want to make a change on the SPKIData front without the list seeing it.] At 12:32 10/5/2000 -0400, Elmar wrote: >If you want to allow any element in the DTD for SPKIData, don't use >(#PCDATA), use %SPKI.Any or something like that. Good point. However, I think like PGPKeyID, the intent is for people to plug in actual present-day SPKI structures (and not an XML representation) . So this would be a Canonical S-expression that is octects (or their base-64 encoding) [1] and could be reprsented as PCDATA. If this is the case, it's the schema that is off; the schema declaration for SPKIData should simply be: <element name='SPKIData' type='string' minOccurs='1' maxOccurs='1'/> Do people agree with my recollection? [1] http://world.std.com/~cme/spki.txt >4.4.3 >Typo in the Schema Definition: must be <element ref='ds:Transforms' ...> The >: was missing. Ok, typo fixed. >What is correct? Text, Schema Def or DTD? >Text says Type is optional, but Schema and DTD require the attribute. If it >is optional, what should be a default type? This has been noted and corrected in editors' copy, it is optional. >4.4.4 >There are missing : in the Schema definition for ref and type of elements. >DTD missing | at the end of the first line after X509SubjectName. Fixed. (Fortunately, these are already correct in the actual schema and DTD because I can validate and parse them, whereas the excerpts in the spec seem to get a little out of line!) >4.4.6 >Numbering occurs twice, for SPKIData and for MgmtData. Fixed. >Thanks to the whole working group. Thanks for your comments! __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 16:23:00 UTC