Wednesday, 20 December 2000
Tuesday, 19 December 2000
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
Monday, 18 December 2000
Saturday, 16 December 2000
Friday, 15 December 2000
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Canonical XML 3.6
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
Thursday, 14 December 2000
Wednesday, 13 December 2000
- RE: Canonical XML 3.6
- RE: Canonical XML 3.6
- RE: Canonical XML 3.6
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- Canonical XML 3.6
- AW: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
Tuesday, 12 December 2000
- New Version of Cannonical XML Issues List and Spec
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- FYI: RE: Character Encoding Question
- Re: Moving Canonical XML along
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
Monday, 11 December 2000
- ANNOUNCE: ISOC Netw. & Distr. Sys. Security Symp. (NDSS'01)
- Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing"
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
Saturday, 9 December 2000
Friday, 8 December 2000
- Re: ECDSA in XML
- Re: ECDSA in XML
- Moving Canonical XML along
- [announcement] "Efficient Descriptive Data Format" specification and SDK released
Thursday, 7 December 2000
Tuesday, 5 December 2000
Friday, 1 December 2000
- Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI
- Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI
- Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI
- XML Key Management Services (fwd)
- AW: Content of element X509SKI
- AW: Canonical XML typo?
- Re: Canonical XML typo?
Thursday, 30 November 2000
- Canonical XML typo?
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- Re: Content of element X509SKI
- Content of element X509SKI
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
Wednesday, 29 November 2000
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....]
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- Re: Summary of OID and URI discussion and steps forward
- Summary of OID and URI discussion and steps forward
- RE: Character Encoding Question
- Re: Character Encoding Question
Tuesday, 28 November 2000
- Character Encoding Question
- RE: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....]
- RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs
Monday, 27 November 2000
- Re: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....]
- [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....]
- Re: ECDSA in XML
- RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- OIDs as URI/URNs....
- RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs
Saturday, 25 November 2000
Friday, 24 November 2000
- Protocol Action: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing to Proposed Standard
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs
- Representation of OIDs as URIs
Wednesday, 22 November 2000
- Closing on Whitespace and Examples 3.4 and 3.7
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-00.txt
Tuesday, 21 November 2000
- DOM & Canonicalization
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-00.txt
- Re: minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031
Monday, 20 November 2000
- Re: minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031
- AW: PKIXML
- Re: PKIXML
- PKIXML
- Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
- RE: Requirements and Goals for the Design of an 'XML Encryption Standard'
- ID for Canonical XML
- documents versus protocols
- Re: question on latest spec
Friday, 17 November 2000
- Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: ECDSA in XML
- Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- ECDSA in XML
Thursday, 16 November 2000
- RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- RE: question on latest spec
- Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
Wednesday, 15 November 2000
- Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- RE: question on latest spec
- Countersignature capabilities in the current draft
- What is signed with the hash of SignatureMethod ?
- I-D ACTION:draft-blake-wilson-xmldsig-ecdsa-00.txt
- Re: DSIG Spec 4.3.3.1 - missing URI
Tuesday, 14 November 2000
Monday, 13 November 2000
Sunday, 12 November 2000
Friday, 10 November 2000
- RE: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- AW: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Thursday, 9 November 2000
- Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- KeyInfo and KeyValue
Wednesday, 8 November 2000
Tuesday, 7 November 2000
- Re: Draft typos and errors
- Re: DSIG spec question, section 2.3
- Re: Draft typos and errors
- Re: Draft typos and errors
- Re: Draft typos and errors
- Re: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Anonymous types in the DSig Schema
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Draft typos and errors
Monday, 6 November 2000
- DSIG spec question, section 2.3
- DSIG Spec 4.3.3.1 - missing URI
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: file corrupted
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Friday, 3 November 2000
- RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Thursday, 2 November 2000
Wednesday, 1 November 2000
- Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Fwd: Call for Implementation: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Tuesday, 31 October 2000
- Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Monday, 30 October 2000
Friday, 27 October 2000
- Grammatical issue in Canonical XML CR section 1.1
- AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Thursday, 26 October 2000
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?
- Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation
Tuesday, 24 October 2000
Monday, 23 October 2000
Sunday, 22 October 2000
Friday, 20 October 2000
Thursday, 19 October 2000
- Re: AW: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Re: Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- XML-Signature Interoperability
- Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- FYI: XPath Errata
- AW: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
Wednesday, 18 October 2000
- Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-10.txt
- minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012
Tuesday, 17 October 2000
Monday, 16 October 2000
- RE: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
- AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
Saturday, 14 October 2000
- Re: Requesting Canonical XML Candidate Rec shortly
- Re: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec)
Thursday, 12 October 2000
Wednesday, 11 October 2000
- Requesting Canonical XML Candidate Rec shortly
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: RetrievalMethod issues
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
Tuesday, 10 October 2000
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: X509Data example minor issue
- Re: RetrievalMethod issues
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- RE: Last Call
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: Minor XMLDSIG edits
- Re: X509Data example minor issue
Monday, 9 October 2000
Sunday, 8 October 2000
Saturday, 7 October 2000
Friday, 6 October 2000
- Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: Old Schema to New Schema XSLT?
- RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples
- Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- wrong ATTLIST for RetrievalMethod in core-09
- Re: LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema
Thursday, 5 October 2000
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema
Friday, 6 October 2000
Thursday, 5 October 2000
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- RE: XMLDigSig WD-2000-09-18
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- AW: AW: Status of Implementations
Wednesday, 4 October 2000
- RE: AW: Status of Implementations
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
Tuesday, 3 October 2000
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- RE: Last Call
- RE: C14N Last Call
- Re: C14N Last Call
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- AW: Brief Report on EESSI Meeting
- Re: Very minor comment in the spec.
- Very minor comment in the spec.
- Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft