Thursday, 30 March 2000
- Expose your business to the Internet
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
Wednesday, 29 March 2000
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
- AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- XPath action item, was Re: Enveloped Signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- AW: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- AW: Object References containing nondterministic behaviour
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- Re: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!)
- Re: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- C14n before XPath (Re: Enveloped signatures and XPath)
Monday, 27 March 2000
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
Monday, 27 March 2000
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Comments on new XPath Filtering proposal
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: I18N WG/IG last call comments
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- Object References containing nondterministic behaviour
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- Comments on new XPath Filtering proposal
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!)
Sunday, 26 March 2000
Saturday, 25 March 2000
Friday, 24 March 2000
- RE: XML Schema WG response to the DSig Last Call WD
- XML Schema WG response to the DSig Last Call WD
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
Thursday, 23 March 2000
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: Enveloped signatures and XPath
- Victoria Face-to-Face
- RE: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!)
- Re: Enveloped signatures and XPath
Wednesday, 22 March 2000
- Enveloped signatures and XPath
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- Re: Xpath transform changes and questions
- RE: Xpath transform changes and questions
Tuesday, 21 March 2000
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: Xpath transform changes and questions
- Re: Xpath transform changes and questions
- Re: Xpath transform changes and questions
Monday, 22 March 1999
Friday, 17 March 2000
Saturday, 18 March 2000
Friday, 17 March 2000
- RE: Xpath transform changes and questions
- RE: Xpath transform changes and questions
- Tentative Agenda for Adelaide
- Xpath transform changes and questions
- RE: Comments on last call draft (BRAVO Kent!!!)
- Re: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- Re: Comments on last call draft
Thursday, 16 March 2000
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- XHTML Extended Forms Requirements
- XMLDSIG March 16th Con Call CONFIRMING CANCELATION
- RetrievalMethod
- RE: Comments on last call draft
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- Re: MimeType and charset
- Re: Comments on last call draft
- Re: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
Wednesday, 15 March 2000
- Re: minor typos in WD-xmldsig-core-20000228
- RE: KeyInfo and KeyValue
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- XML-encoding of SPKI Certificates
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- Re: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- Re: MimeType and charset
- Last Call: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing to Proposed Standard
- Re: KeyInfo and KeyValue
- RE: KeyInfo and KeyValue
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: Comments on last call draft
- Re: KeyInfo and KeyValue
- Re: Comments on last call draft
Tuesday, 14 March 2000
- KeyInfo and KeyValue
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- XSL WG comments on XML Signatures
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- MimeType and charset
- Re: Comments on last call draft
- Re: KeyInfo questions/comments
Monday, 13 March 2000
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- Re: KeyInfo questions/comments
- RE: Face to Face meeting Schedule CHANGE to April 20th in Victoria
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- XMLDSIG March 16th Con Call Tentative Cancelation
- Re: KeyInfo questions/comments
- RE: Comments on last call draft
- RE: KeyInfo questions/comments
- KeyInfo questions/comments
- Face to Face meeting Schedule CHANGE to April 20th in Victoria
- Re: Comments on last call draft
Saturday, 11 March 2000
Friday, 10 March 2000
Thursday, 9 March 2000
- Face to Face meeting April 13th in Victoria
- RE: Comments on last call draft
- Comments on last call draft
Tuesday, 7 March 2000
Friday, 3 March 2000
- Minutes 2000-March-02
- Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Wrong URL
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Wrong URL
Thursday, 2 March 2000
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Typos
- AW: Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Canonicalization
- Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Question regarding sec 6.3.1 (HMAC)
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Sec. 7.1 contradicts XML 1.0
- Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Question regarding sec 6.3.1 (HMAC)
Wednesday, 1 March 2000
- XMLDSIG Con Call agenda, 2 March 2000
- Re: Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Updated working group charter
- Separate namespace for KeyInfo?
- Comments on Last Call XML Signature Specification
- Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Lack of expressiveness in DTDs
- Re: Comments on 28022000 draft: Lack of expressiveness in DTDs
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Lack of expressiveness in DTDs
- Last Call Errors
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Error in 2.1 Simple example
- Comments on 28022000 draft: URI/IDREF
- Comments on 28022000 draft: Typos
- Re: X509Data (S/MIME Warning)
- Re: X509Data
- Re: X509Data
Tuesday, 29 February 2000
Monday, 28 February 2000
Friday, 25 February 2000
- RE: Faulty DTD of Object element
- Re: KeyInfo->KeyValue
- Re: Faulty DTD of Object element
- Re: Faulty DTD of Object element
- Re: Faulty DTD of Object element
Thursday, 24 February 2000
Wednesday, 23 February 2000
Monday, 21 February 2000
- Re: draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04 question
- RE: draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04 question
- draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-04 question
- Faulty DTD of Object element
- KeyInfo->KeyValue
Saturday, 19 February 2000
Friday, 18 February 2000
Thursday, 17 February 2000
Wednesday, 16 February 2000
- XMLDSIG con call agenda 17 Feb 2000
- Re: Signatures draft
- IMPORTANT: Change in XMLDSIG telecon numbers
Tuesday, 15 February 2000
Monday, 14 February 2000
Friday, 11 February 2000
- Re: A "plug/play" URI/IDREF proposal
- Re: A "plug/play" URI/IDREF proposal
- Signature WG Comments to XML WG
Thursday, 10 February 2000
Wednesday, 9 February 2000
- Document Action: XML-Signature Requirements to Informational
- Latest Draft (We are going to Last Call soon!) and Minority Reports
Friday, 4 February 2000
Thursday, 3 February 2000
- Minutes: 00-February-03
- MUST READ [Canonicalization] -- Draft of XML Signature's WG offi cial reaction to Canonical XML
- [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-03.txt
Wednesday, 2 February 2000
Tuesday, 1 February 2000
- Re: fragment identifier as uri? (IDREF baggage)
- Re: fragment identifier as uri? (IDREF baggage)
- Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes)
- Re: fragment identifier as uri? (Was: 000106 Minutes)
Monday, 31 January 2000
Friday, 28 January 2000
Wednesday, 26 January 2000
- RE: XPath transform
- NSPW 2000 Call For Papers
- RE: Which character encoding to use if null c14n is used?
- Re: XPath transform
Tuesday, 25 January 2000
- Re: Which character encoding to use if null c14n is used?
- Re: Thoughts on Threat Model
- AW: FTF Draft Minutes
- AW: Thoughts on Threat Model
- Updated current Section 8
- Revised current Section 7
- Changes to current Section 7
- FTF Draft Minutes
- RE: Thoughts on Threat Model
- AW: Thoughts on Threat Model
- Yes, RE: [Moderator Action] Should alg spec be included in hashed data?
- Chair Announce: Telecon info
Monday, 24 January 2000
- Thoughts on Threat Model
- Re: W3C XML Canonicalization -- must read
- [Moderator Action] Should alg spec be included in hashed data?
- RE: XPath transform
- suggest text re "Type", resend
Saturday, 22 January 2000
Friday, 21 January 2000
Thursday, 20 January 2000
- Last Call for Canonical XML
- RE: San Jose Agenda - regrets
- RE: San Jose Agenda - regrets
- RE: San Jose Agenda - regrets
Tuesday, 18 January 2000
- RE: Scenarios/FAQ
- RE: Scenarios/FAQ
- Re: Scenarios/FAQ
- Re: Scenarios/FAQ
- San Jose Agenda
- Scenarios/FAQ
Monday, 17 January 2000
- RE: XPath transform
- Re: Chair Announce: Last Draft before FTF
- RE: XPath transform
- Re: XPath transform
Saturday, 15 January 2000
Friday, 14 January 2000
- Chair Announce: Last Draft before FTF
- RE: XPath transform
- Re: Draft 04-January-2000: Errors and typos
- XPath transform
- suggest text re "Type"
Thursday, 13 January 2000
- Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
- Canonical XML Last Call
- RE: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
- RE: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
- Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
Wednesday, 12 January 2000
- Re: Some errors and typos in the latest XML-Signature draft, Part 1
- RE: Transforms useless in current spec
- AW: Transforms useless in current spec
- RE: Transforms useless in current spec
- Which character encoding to use if null c14n is used?
- Draft 04-January-2000: Algorithm/Transform/Parameter
- The URI vs. IDREF problem
- Draft 04-January-2000: Errors and typos
- AW: Transforms useless in current spec
Tuesday, 11 January 2000
- Re: Signature definitions
- Chair Announce: FTF Confirmed Attendees and Goals
- RE: Transforms useless in current spec
- Re: Transforms useless in current spec
- [Fwd: 000106 Minutes]
- Re: Signature definitions
Monday, 10 January 2000
- RE: Signature definitions
- Re: Signature definitions
- Transforms useless in current spec
- Signature definitions
Friday, 7 January 2000
Thursday, 6 January 2000
Wednesday, 5 January 2000
- RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- Call Tomorrow 00/01/04 (NOTE: New number)
- An implementation
Tuesday, 4 January 2000
- CA: latest draft available 20000104
- RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- RE: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF
- Re: Difficulties with URI="" and IDREF