- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 17:07:38 -0400
- To: Greg Whitehead <gwhitehead@signio.com>
- Cc: "'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 13:15 99/09/20 -0700, Greg Whitehead wrote: >I've seen several references to an XHASH spec, but can't find it. Any >pointers would be appreciated. Greg, In an odd sort of way, there is presently no "current spec." However, we are moving as quickly as possible to document the open issues in the body of [1] (which is a product of WG consensus) and publish it as an ietf-draft and W3C Technical Report. The draft you are referring to [2] has references to a few things (such as XHash) that I don't think have been publically specified. The "Brown Draft" [2] was a private draft/proposal and was unfortunately named using the WG name instead of the authors' name. (Though Don should be able to speak more authoritatively to the pacing of the syntax specification [3]). The Syntax C14N as specified in [4] has been implemented [5]. [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core-990902.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/draft-ietf-xmldsig-signature-00.txt [3] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Overview#eastlake [4] http://www.w3.org/1999/07/WD-xml-c14n-19990729.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/1999JulSep/0247.html _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 20 September 1999 17:07:44 UTC