- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:07:52 -0400
- To: pgrosso@arbortext.com
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, chairs@w3.org
[1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/Group/dependencies.html This document has been prepared during the [7]Last Call of the [8]XML Signature Requirements Document. This coordination is expected to be guided bythe [9]XML Activity Process for Requirements and Issue Tracking. The following text describes the Signature WG Chairs' views on dependencies or requests for review that must be satisfied prior to the XML Signature specifications being advanced beyond Last Call. We are soliciting a commitment to resolve a dependency (by having it addressed it in a spec or RD) and/or a commitment to review the XML Signature specification(s) -- a specific question is sometimes included as well. The W3C staff contact for the WG is idenitified though he need not necessarily be the designated reviewer. XML Package (forthcoming) Dependency: logical/assertion semantics of package must be explicit. Dependency: expectations regarding the processing (e.g., white space) of content within a package must not violate signature or XML content semantics. Dependency: signed content in/over packages. How to combine element IDs? Dependency: how to show the relative relationships of package parts. For example, how to include XML content with stylesheets and related resources used for rendering. _________________________________________________________ Joseph Reagle Jr. Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org XML-Signature Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 17 September 1999 16:07:58 UTC