- From: Todd S. Glassey <Todd.Glassey@www.meridianus.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 11:58:03 -0700
- To: "Barb Fox \(Exchange\)" <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com>, "'Chris Smithies'" <Chris_Smithies@penop.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
How do you tie multiple signature blocks together into a cohesive document structure? Todd ----- Original Message ----- From: Barb Fox (Exchange) <bfox@Exchange.Microsoft.com> To: 'Chris Smithies' <Chris_Smithies@penop.com>; <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 7:51 AM Subject: RE: Multiple signatures in a sig_block > Chris: > > This is a subtle but very important point: having multiple signature > elements within a SigBlock has nothing to do with the number of signers. > Each signer can sign the same document independently or indicate that he is > also signing in the other signatures with a single signature in the > SigBlock. This is a much cleaner way to get the evidence you're looking for > and is easy to do with an XML signature. > > --Barbara Fox > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Smithies [mailto:Chris_Smithies@penop.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 6:59 AM > To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > Subject: Multiple signatures in a sig_block > > > > > The value of allowing multiple Signature elements in a SigBlock (sig_block, > signatureBlock, whatever...) is that in the future, multiple signing > technologies may well be used in the course of the same transaction, with > the same intent, by the same person, governing the same content. It may > also be that different signature standards are required by different > recipients of the document. It would clearly be efficient and useful from a > procedural and evidentiary point of view for these signatures to be > combined together into a single entity. > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 14:45:34 UTC