- From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:24:13 -0400
- To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Hi Ken,
--On September 19, 2013 at 11:53:35 AM -0400 Ken Murchison
<murch@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
> "Client and server implementations that already support the Brief field
> header should be able to add support for the return=minimal preference
> with little effort." (I had "minimal effort" but it didn't read right)
Change:
"field header" to "header field"
"should be able to" to "can".
> "If a server receives both Brief and Prefer header fields in a request,
> it MUST ignore the Brief header field and only apply the Prefer header
> field preferences, if it so chooses."
The MUST and "if it so choose" are conflicting. How about:
If a server supporting the Prefer header receives both Brief and Prefer
header fields in a request, it MUST ignore the Brief header field and
only use the Prefer header field preferences.
--
Cyrus Daboo
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 16:24:39 UTC