- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:53:08 +0200
- To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
- CC: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On 2013-09-19 16:43, Ken Murchison wrote: > On 09/19/2013 10:38 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote: >> Hi Ken, >> >> --On September 19, 2013 at 10:05:04 AM -0400 Ken Murchison >> <murch@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote: >> >>>>> If you feel that this is a show-stopper, I can certainly remove this >>>>> text. >>>> >>>> I'd get rid of it. >>> >>> OK. >>> >> >> Well I do think it is worth mentioning that the Brief header exists >> and this new draft is defining a standards-based alternative to that - >> emphasizing that servers/clients that currently support Brief can also >> implement Prefer without any problems. The only thing to state is that >> if a server receives both Brief and Prefer it should prefer Prefer! Prefer: prefer /me ducks > Do you have any suggested text to replace/augment what I have in > Appendix A? I think Julian wants me to remove the suggestion that > Prefer-based implementations also implement Brief. Stating where it came from is good (plus having the references). I just wouldn't recommend to implement it; if you do so, people *will* ask what the point of the new spec is. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 19 September 2013 14:53:54 UTC