- From: Javier Godoy <rjgodoy@fich.unl.edu.ar>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:14:19 -0300
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Werner Baumann" <werner.baumann@onlinehome.de>
- Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
On 2011-12-18 18:58, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-18 22:11, Werner Baumann wrote: > > Copy with Depth: 0 is one of the fancy ideas of RFC 4918 that was never > > seriously defined, just as Collection is mostly undefined. > > The spec says: > > "A COPY of "Depth: 0" only instructs that the collection and its > properties, but not resources identified by its internal member URLs, are to > be copied." > > The problem I can see is that if you read this literally, you'd copy the > bindings to the member resources, which is unlikely to be intended. Sounds > like an erratum to me. > > Do you see other problems? It follows that the requirement in Section 9.8.4 does not hold if Depth is 0: "when a collection is overwritten, the membership of the destination collection after the successful COPY request MUST be the same membership as the source collection immediately before the COPY." I agree it looks like an erratum. Best Regards Javier
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 11:18:31 UTC