- From: David Nuescheler <david@day.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:58:58 +0200
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Hi All, Julian and I (and occasionally many others) have been discussing a development effort like this for quite while. I was involved in mapping the scope of WebDAV (and friends) into a Java API called JCR[1][2][3] (on which for example Geoff, Julian and Roy participated) and due to my Day[4] job (pun intended) I find myself very often in a situation where I need have a standard web-browser or client-sided web-application interact with a server to exchange fine-grained information. Thanks a lot to everybody for all the comments and input. I guess my main take from this is that I completely agree that we need to separate the "model"-conversation from the "format/binding"-conversation. I would like to mention though that in my mind the goal of making this effort relevant, efficient and simple is extremely important as well. While I appreciate that the separation of the discussions, I would like to volunteer to work on bindings to a JSON + PATCH (multipart POST) very early on in the process and keep it in sync with the model as a living set of examples for the interaction with the more abstract model, to ensure that we keep things practical. I think there are of a large number of very similar, JSON/POST-based "protocols" that are defined in an ad-hoc manner by developers. So there should be quite a bit of experience out there, that can help us gauge the importance some of requirements fairly quickly. I think if we manage to take the combined the experience from WebDAV, AtomPub and JCR (and possibly more domain specific efforts like CMIS) in terms of the overall scope and the initial relevance of certain features we should be in great shape. regards, david [1] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170 [2] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=283 [3] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=333 [4] http://www.day.com -- David Nuescheler Chief Technology Officer mailto: david.nuescheler@day.com web: http://www.day.com/ http://dev.day.com twitter: @davidnuescheler
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 07:48:43 UTC