- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:26:21 +0200
- To: Angela Schreiber <anchela@day.com>
- CC: ietf@ietf.org, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Hi Angela, thanks for the feedback. Comments inline: Angela Schreiber wrote: > Editorial Comments: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - 2.2. URI Mappings Created by a new Binding > I have the impression that there is a typo: > > "Note that if R is a collection, additional URI mappings are created > to the descendents of R." > -> > "Note that if R is a collection, additional URI mappings are created > to the descendants of R." My spell checker says both is OK in en-US, in doubt, the RFC Editor will fix this. > - The document uses both 'behavior' and 'behaviour'. > I am not sure whether the document prefers British over American > english spelling. My impression is that both spellings occur (e.g. > internationalization, marshalling, signalled and behaviour/behavior) > ... but I'm not a native speaker. In my working copy, I changed the text to consistently use the US spelling (note that it's not clear that we will submit a new draft before it gets onto the IESG agenda, in which case, again, it would be up to the RFC Editor to fix this). > - The examples with 'CollY' (or any other characters following 'Coll') > would be easier to read for me if it was written 'CollectionY'. > ... I see your point, but making the example paths longer would cause problems with the width of the artwork in the examples (which is restricted to 72 characters because of the text format). Thus we have chosen to use a consistent and short naming scheme. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 14:26:59 UTC