Re: Litmus test questions

I actually handled it here by catching and ignoring that single expact  
error, thinking it was the right thing to do =)

I'm somewhat happy to hear this is going to be fixed, because it felt  
wrong (even though I'd trust litmus before not-fatal expat errors).

I just thought some clients 'might' send this over, which is why this  
test was written as such. Hearing this is not the case, I'll get rid  
of the workaround right now :)


On 3-Sep-08, at 7:50 PM, Joe Orton wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 09:52:01AM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> ...
>>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><propertyupdate
>>> xmlns='DAV:'><set><prop><t:valnspace
>>> xmlns:t=''><foo
>>> xmlns='bar'/></t:valnspace></prop></set></propertyupdate>
>>> The 'bar' namespace is an invalid one, and expat is quickly to  
>>> respond
>>> with: xmlns: URI bar is not absolute, so I respond with a 400 Bad
>>> Request..
> Hi folks.  I don't think there's a reason why 'bar' is used in that  
> test
> in favour of a real URI.  I'll update the test to use a real URI there
> instead.
> Regards, Joe

Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 01:41:20 UTC