- From: Werner Baumann <werner.baumann@onlinehome.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:17:23 +0200
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
There is still a problem with the approach taken by davfs2. Within HTTP, "on the wire", URLs must be %-encoded as mentioned by Tim. A "/" within a path-segment will be represented by "%2f". But when used as path-separator, "/" must *not* be encoded. At some point a client will have to decode the URL-path-component. davfs2 stores the URL-path in its decoded form and encodes it again when used in a request. But in this case, it can not distinguish between "/" as path-separator and "/" within a path-segment. So you better store the URL-path in its %-encoded form as received from the server. You still have to check for trailing-slash-errors (I had a report about a server that does not accept URLs when send exactly as received from the server, because it mixed up the trailing-slash-rules). Very strange: I just tested with Windows2000 and WindowsServer2003. Both of them did *not* allow to create file-names containing a "/"-character. Did Microsoft change this good policy to the bad in XP? "/" is the path-separator in HTTP. As today everything can end up in the World Wide Web, "/"-characters in file-names should always be rejected. Werner
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 09:42:05 UTC